| … | … | @@ -1533,9 +1533,58 @@ it.layer(NodeServices.layer)("server settings", (it) => { | |
| 1536 | 1555 | }).pipe(Effect.provide(layerServerSettingsWithSecrets())), | |
| 1537 | 1556 | ); | |
| 1538 | 1557 | ||
| 1558 | + | it.effect("keeps a per-host token reference as written and drops the literal it replaces", () => | |
src/serverSettings.test.ts:1558
This repeats the existing source-control secret-store scenario immediately above. Could you fold the per-host reference assertions into that case instead of adding another test?
No longer relevant as of 350aba94a9a71da845fd198568782e6fd63660e8
Folded into the existing source-control secret-store case in 350aba94a9. That case now also checks the per-host GitHub reference and that the other host keeps its literal.
| … | … | @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ | |
| 85 | + | assert.deepEqual(reads, ["github#token"]); | |
| 86 | + | }).pipe(Effect.provide(layerResolver)), | |
| 87 | + | ); | |
| 88 | + | ||
sourceControl/sourceControlHostSecrets.test.ts:88
This checks object identity and resolver-call wiring rather than a distinct credential behavior; the mixed-token case already checks that literals remain unchanged. Could you delete this test?
No longer relevant as of 350aba94a9a71da845fd198568782e6fd63660e8
Removed in 350aba94a9.
Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.