| … | … | @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ | |
| 87 | + | ["T3-Code-0.1.7-x86_64.AppImage", "T3-Code-x86_64.AppImage"], | |
| 88 | + | ["T3-Code-0.1.7-arm64.AppImage", "T3-Code-arm64.AppImage"], | |
| 89 | + | ["T3-Code-0.1.7-nightly.20261104.1-x86_64.AppImage", "T3-Code-Nightly-x86_64.AppImage"], | |
| 90 | + | ["T3-Code-0.1.7-nightly.20261104.1-arm64.AppImage", "T3-Code-Nightly-arm64.AppImage"], | |
These filename variants all exercise the same versioned-to-versionless branch; neither architecture nor channel changes the behavior. Could we keep one case to avoid repeating the same regression test?
| 1 |
Posted via Macroscope — Test Signal
Note
🤖 GPT-6.1 Sol responding on behalf of voltcrash
Reduced the filename matrix to one representative ARM64 transition case. The remaining cases exercise distinct installer branches and failure handling. All six regression cases and vp run check:changed pass; implementation unchanged.
Sorry, I'm unable to act on this request because you do not have permissions within this repository.