README.md
Accepted Audit Implementation Plans
Generated on 2026-07-18 against 878c937c3621ab35002e453da563f6ba551d6e86. This directory contains exactly one self-contained Improve plan for each of the 26 accepted findings. Plans preserve current end-to-end behavior except their named correction and recommend no unit or integration tests.
Status and accepted-ID mapping
Status values: TODO, IN PROGRESS, DONE, BLOCKED — <reason>, REJECTED — <reason>.
Dependency graph and execution waves
Hard dependencies: 004 → 014 (avoid conflicting Order/QPay edits) and 018 → 023 (remove duplicate exports before choosing package resolution). All other ordering is coordination, not a blocker.
- Wave 1 — independent work and information gates: 001 002 003 004 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 024 025 026.
- Wave 2 — after decisions or blockers: 005 006 014 023.
Items labeled needs-info or ready-for-human begin with an owner/operator evidence gate; they are not permission to guess.
Verified repository command inventory
These commands exist in baseline manifests; planning did not execute builds, installs, deploys, migrations, purges, or teardown:
| Command | Baseline meaning | Expected executor result |
|---|---|---|
bun run check-types | Turbo workspace type checks | exit 0 |
bun run build | Turbo workspace builds | exit 0 |
bun run lint | Biome lint | exit 0 |
bun run --cwd apps/admin check-types / build | dashboard checks/build | exit 0 |
bun run --cwd apps/storev2 check-types / build | Astro checks/build | exit 0 |
bun run --cwd apps/agent checkout:sim | existing checkout simulation | successful disposable flow with configured environment |
bun run --cwd apps/agent payment:proof | existing Payment proof CLI | accepted invariant with configured environment |
Every plan states its real browser/API/Worker/Messenger/CLI proof. Environment credentials and operator approval are prerequisites and must never be printed. Destructive or remote-write commands are not verification.
Delivery validator
Run python3 plans/validate.py from the repository root. Expected: exit 0 and a PASS line covering all 26 contiguous baseline excerpts, accepted/rejected/discussion sets, information gates, dependencies, JSON, Markdown links, rendered copy content, public safety, and plans-only scope.
Existing-issue coordination
No accepted audit ID appears in the 34 open issues inspected during recon. Adjacent work must be coordinated without claiming duplicates or closing/modifying issues:
- Plan 001: Coordinate with broad go-live issue #125; do not claim duplication or modify it.
- Plan 004: Coordinate with adjacent order-error issue #149; this is not claimed as a duplicate.
- Plan 005: Coordinate with broad issues #125 and #149; preserve ADR-0004 and do not claim duplication.
- Plan 006: Coordinate with adjacent storefront error issue #149; this targets admin paid edits.
- Plan 007: Coordinate with search issue #149 and separate mobile card issue #159; do not claim duplication.
- Plan 008: Coordinate with adjacent category count issue #163; this is distinct list semantics.
- Plan 011: Coordinate with broader catalog URL issues #165 and #167; no duplicate claim.
- Plan 012: Coordinate with #149 asset QA and #172 delivery copy/loading work; neither duplicates state flow.
- Plan 013: Coordinate with broad old-link QA in #149; do not claim duplication.
- Plan 014: Coordinate with payment launch issue #125; keep this narrow.
- Plan 016: Coordinate with broad Messenger PRD #16; no exact overlap.
- Plan 017: Coordinate with go-live issue #125; do not close or modify it.
- Plan 018: Coordinate with package-boundary issue #139; this is the narrower deletion.
- Plan 019: Coordinate directly with open CI issue #139.
- Plan 021: Coordinate with operational issue #125.
- Plan 022: Coordinate with operational command context in #125.
- Plan 023: Coordinate with open package-boundary/CI issue #139; do not absorb its broader scope.
- Plan 025: Coordinate with migration sequencing context in #125; do not run or modify that issue.
- Plan 026: Coordinate with cache ownership work in #125.
Rejected findings — record only, do not plan or publish
A-02— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.A-05— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.A-08— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.A-11— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.D-02— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.D-05— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.D-06— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.D-09— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.S-01— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.S-02— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.P-03— rejected by the user; intentionally absent from plans and child drafts.
Needs discussion — not accepted and not publishable
A-06 — Delete the production photo diagnostic. User note: “No note provided”. Decision question: Should the production photo diagnostic be deleted, retained with an explicit owner/access policy, or handled in a separately approved change? No plan or issue draft exists until the user answers.
Publication boundary
github-issue-proposal.md and .json are drafts only. Do not publish until the user explicitly approves. Public drafts omit paths, snippets, secrets, Customer data, payload recipes, and unsafe operational instructions.